<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HYDRO TERRESTRIAL JOURNAL</title>
	<link>http://ecospatial.informe.com/blog</link>
	<description>Spatial Ecology &#38; Biophysical Environment of the Terrestrial &#38; Freshwater Ecosystems</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Spatial - Ecological Assessment of Land-use / Land-cover: Caparo River Valley, Republic of Trinidad &#038; Tobago</title>
		<link>http://ecospatial.informe.com/blog/2008/11/01/spatial-ecological-assessment-of-land-use-land-cover-caparo-river-valley-republic-of-trinidad-tobago/</link>
		<comments>http://ecospatial.informe.com/blog/2008/11/01/spatial-ecological-assessment-of-land-use-land-cover-caparo-river-valley-republic-of-trinidad-tobago/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 00:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecospatial.informe.com/blog/2008/11/01/spatial-ecological-assessment-of-land-use-land-cover-caparo-river-valley-republic-of-trinidad-tobago/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 


 


Spatial - Ecological Assessment of Land-use / Land-cover: Agriculturally-disturbed &#8220;Tropical Moist Forest (Cool Dry Transition)&#8221; in the Caparo River Valley, Republic of Trinidad &#038; Tobago


Authors: Karl Ramjohn, Floyd B. Lucas, Carol L. Ramjohn &#038; Winston Johnson, Tropical Environment Research &#038; Management Center, Trinidad &#038; Tobago. January 2006




___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



ECOSYSTEM
CLASSIFICATION &#038; FUNCTIONAL DYNAMICS


 Beard (1946) classified the study [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">
 
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
 
</p>
<p class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span>Spatial - Ecological Assessment of Land-use / Land-cover: Agriculturally-disturbed &#8220;Tropical Moist Forest (Cool Dry Transition)&#8221; in the Caparo River Valley, Republic of Trinidad &#038; Tobago</span></strong>
</p>
<p class="MsoHeader">
<span><em>Authors: Karl Ramjohn, Floyd B. Lucas, Carol L. Ramjohn &#038; Winston Johnson,</em> Tropical Environment Research &#038; Management Center, Trinidad &#038; Tobago. January 2006<br />
</span>
</p>
<p class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span><br />
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
</span></strong>
</p>
<p class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span>ECOSYSTEM<br />
CLASSIFICATION &#038; FUNCTIONAL DYNAMICS</span></strong>
</p>
<p class="MsoHeader">
<span> Beard (1946) classified the study area as being predominantly </span><span>Seasonal</span><span> </span><span>Evergreen</span><span> </span><span>Forest</span><span> (mixed <span class="spelle">Crappo-Guatecare</span>). Beard’s study (which remains as the only comprehensive ground-based island-wide assessment of flora) focussed on classifications based on dominants within the community, mainly from an economic timber and Forestry management perspective. Those classifications represent conditions ~60 years ago, and several of the species assemblages described by Beard (1946) are no longer recognizable, having undergone significant alterations, fragmentation and conversion into secondary forest and other land-uses (Ramjohn <em>et al</em>.2001, Joseph 1999, Nelson 1999). </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span> A more recent study by Nelson (2004), which attempted classification of indigenous forests based on a landscape-ecology and ecosystem-management perspective, delineated </span><span>Trinidad</span><span> into two major terrestrial eco-regions – </span><span>Dry</span><span> </span><span>Forest</span><span> and </span><span>Moist</span><span> </span><span>Forest</span><span>. According to that study, the project site (confluence of the <span class="spelle">Caparo</span> and </span><span class="spelle"><span>Mamoral</span></span><span> </span><span>Rivers</span><span>) is located approximately on the boundary between the two eco-regions; thus it may be regarded as being within a transition zone between two significant moisture regimes. Based on maps prepared by Nelson (2004), the middle and upper reaches<br />
of the </span><span class="spelle"><span>Caparo</span></span><span> </span><span>Basin</span><span> would be in the wetter region supporting “</span><span>Tropical</span><span> </span><span>Moist</span><span> </span><span>Forest</span><span>”, with the lower <span class="spelle">catchment</span> in the drier region classified as “</span><span>Tropical</span><span> </span><span>Moist</span><span> </span><span>Forest</span><span>, Cool Dry<br />
Transition”.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>The long history of agricultural activity in the </span><span class="spelle"><span>Caparo</span></span><span> </span><span>Valley</span><span> has resulted in significant alterations to the native vegetation and forests. In general, higher-quality closed-canopy forest remains only as a few patches in this area (Nelson 2004). These forested remnants largely persist on the higher slopes of the occasional spurs and ridges, such as the area immediately north of the project site. The higher-integrity forest remnants persist as patches embedded in a wider (macro-habitat) matrix of cultivated areas, grassland/<span class="spelle">lastro</span> and secondary forest. As a result of the traditional land-use patterns, much of the vegetation resources in the immediate vicinity of the confluence are of agricultural origin. Therefore, while natural and semi-natural vegetation exists in the surrounding area, the agronomic aspects of the biological environment will have a more dominant role in defining the site’s ecological character.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
 
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>From an ecosystem perspective, agricultural production systems may be regarded as restructured and simplified natural environments, as they rely on plant-based biomass productivity through photosynthesis, nutrient recycling via microbial activity, <em>etc</em>. However, their functioning requires subsidised ecological processes, and their habitat structure and complexity (as well as spatial arrangement of biota) are intentionally simplified and controlled, to focus on the productivity of a small number of targeted elements. Agricultural ecosystems are land-use units comprising soil, crop, tree, weed, livestock, pathogen and insect sub-systems that continuously interact to transform solar energy, water, nutrients, labour and other (e.g., agro-chemical) inputs into biomass yields as food, feed, fuel,<br />
fibre and pharmaceuticals.      </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>Furthermore, even in areas of </span><span>Trinidad</span><span> where secondary forests have regenerated via natural succession (subsequent to agricultural abandonment)<span class="grame">,</span> the historical land-use patterns are often critical factors in determining the ecological integrity of the “replacement” ecosystem. Depending on the type of previous cropping systems, physical and biological remnants of the agricultural activities may strongly influence (either beneficially or adversely) their natural <span class="spelle">sucession</span>trajectories, as well as ecosystem structure and function, and related trends in their biodiversity and other natural resources. </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>Archival land-use maps indicate that in this<br />
part of </span><span>Trinidad</span><span>, agriculture was dominated by </span><span>Cocoa</span><span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Theobroma</em></span><em><br />
cacao</em>) and Coffee (<span class="spelle"><em>Coffea</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">arabica</span></em>) production to the north of the </span><span class="spelle"><span>Caparo</span></span><span> Valley <span class="spelle">Brasso</span><br />
Road</span><span>, with Sugar Cane (</span><span class="spelle"><em><span>Saccharum</span></em></span><em><span> sp</span></em><span>.</span><span>) cultivation dominating to the south of the road. Thus, the project<br />
site was in an effective boundary zone between the two major historical<br />
export-cropping systems of economic importance. At present, there is little </span><span>Cocoa</span><span> production remaining in the<br />
immediate area, although Sugar Cane cultivation still takes place within parts<br />
of the study site. Much of the agricultural land formerly under </span><span>Cocoa</span><span> was subsequently cultivated with<br />
Citrus (<em>Citrus sp</em>.), especially a 1200-acre site downstream in the <span class="spelle">Palmiste/Todds</span>’ Road area. In the wider study area, land<br />
still under Cocoa/Coffee production is located higher in the <span class="spelle">catchment</span> of the </span><span class="spelle"><span>Caparo</span></span><span> </span><span>River</span><span>, such as <span class="spelle">Benji</span><br />
Trace (approaching </span><span class="spelle"><span>Flanagin</span></span><span> </span><span>Town</span><span>).</span>
</p>
<div align="center">
<strong><br />
Table-01: UTM Coordinates of Vegetation Survey</strong>
</div>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<div style="text-align: center">
<img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image010.gif" border="0" />
</div>
</p>
<div align="center">
<strong>Table-02: Vegetation Species Recorded for Caparo / Mamoral Site Surveys</strong>
</div>
</p>
<div style="text-align: center">
<img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image011.gif" border="0" width="546" height="864" /><br />
<img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image012.gif" border="0" width="546" height="864" /><br />
<img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image013.gif" border="0" />
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<strong>VEGETATION CHARACTERISTICS &#038; LAND-COVER QUALITY</strong>
</p>
<p class="MsoBodyText">
<span>The project site for the surveys was<br />
centred in the area surrounding the confluence of the Caparo and </span><span>Mamoral</span><span> </span><span>Rivers</span><span>. As<br />
such, the primary focus for site characterization was on the area around Carr<br />
Caparo Trace, Carr Mamoral Trace, Lynch Trace (</span><span>Mamoral Road</span><span>),<br />
and the stretch of the </span><span>Caparo<br />
Valley Brasso Road</span><span><br />
adjacent to the proposed development. However, to assist in fitting the<br />
proposal into the existing land-use and development patterns of its landscape<br />
unit (in the context of cumulative impacts), an overview of ecological<br />
conditions was obtained by paying brief visits to other areas along the Caparo<br />
Valley Brasso Road (both north and south of the site), including Palmiste,<br />
Todds’ Road, Chickland/Caparo Road, Santa Phillipa Road, Benji Trace and<br />
Flanagin Town.</span>
</p>
<p class="MsoBodyText">
<span>The vegetation surveys at the site (and<br />
surrounding areas) revealed four broad classes that can be used to describe the<br />
land-use/land-cover from a spatial/ecological perspective. These are summarized<br />
in Table-03:</span>
</p>
<div align="center">
<span><strong>Table-03: Summary of Land-use / Land Cover at Project Site</strong></span><br />
<span></span>
</div>
<p class="MsoBodyText">
 
</p>
<div style="text-align: center">
<img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image014.gif" border="0" />
</div>
<p><strong>IMAGE-01: EXAMPLES OF LAND-COVER / TERRESTRIAL VEGETATION AT CAPARO / MAMORAL<br />
</strong>
</p>
<div style="text-align: center">
<div align="center">
<strong><br />
Image-01-01:<br />
Semi-closed Riparian Vegetation Community, Caparo River (Downstream of<br />
Confluence) {Photo: Karl Ramjohn, January 2006}</strong>
</div>
<p><img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image010.jpg" border="0" />
</div>
<div align="center">
<strong><br />
Image-01-02:<br />
Open/disturbed Riparian Vegetation Community, Caparo River (Upstream of<br />
Confluence) {Photo: Karl Ramjohn, January 2006}</strong>
</div>
<div style="text-align: center">
<img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image011.jpg" border="0" />
</div>
<div align="center">
<strong><br />
Image-01-03: Semi-open Riparian Vegetation Community, Caparo River (Upstream of Confluence) {Photo: Karl Ramjohn, January 2006}</strong>
</div>
<div style="text-align: center">
<img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image012.jpg" border="0" />
</div>
</p>
<div align="center">
<strong>Image-01-04: Flat grassland in river valley backed by forested ridge of<br />
higher elevation, Carr Mamoral Trace {Photo: Karl Ramjohn, January 2006}</strong>
</div>
<div style="text-align: center">
<img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image013.jpg" border="0" />
</div>
<div align="center">
<strong><br />
Image-01-05: Grassland along Caparo Valley Brasso Road (Riparian<br />
vegetation along Caparo River, background) {Photo: Floyd Lucas,<br />
December 2005}</strong>
</div>
<div style="text-align: center">
<img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image014.jpg" border="0" />
</div>
<div align="center">
<strong><br />
Image-01-06: Mixed forest land-cover on edge of Mamoral Cemetary, Lynch Trace {Photo: Karl Ramjohn, January 2006}</strong>
</div>
<div style="text-align: center">
<img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image015.jpg" border="0" />
</div>
<p><strong>IMAGE-02: EXAMPLES OF AGRICULTURAL VEGETATION AT CAPARO / MAMORAL<br />
</strong>
</p>
<div align="center">
<strong><br />
Image-02-01: Small-scale food cropping on banks of Caparo River, off Carr Caparo Trace {Photo: Karl Ramjohn, January 2006}</strong>
</div>
<div style="text-align: center">
<img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image016.jpg" border="0" />
</div>
</p>
<div align="center">
<strong>Image-02-02: Cassava (<em>Manihot escuelenta</em>) cultivation along Caparo River, off Carr Mamoral Trace {Photo: Floyd Lucas, December 2005}</strong>
</div>
<div style="text-align: center">
<img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image017.jpg" border="0" />
</div>
</p>
<div align="center">
<strong>Image-02-03: Sugar Cane (<em>Saccharum officinarum</em>) cultivation along Caparo River, Carr Mamoral Trace {Photo: Karl Ramjohn, January 2006}</strong>
</div>
<div style="text-align: center">
<img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image018.jpg" border="0" />
</div>
<div align="center">
<strong><br />
Image-02-04: Pigeon Peas (<em>Cajanus cajun</em>) and other food crop cultivation, Lynch Trace {Photo: Karl Ramjohn, January 2006}</strong>
</div>
<div style="text-align: center">
<img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image019.jpg" border="0" />
</div>
</p>
<div align="center">
<strong>Image-02-05: Citrus Estate at Todds&#8217; Road, off Caparo Valley Brasso Road (north of site) {Photo: Floyd Lucas, December 2005}</strong>
</div>
<div style="text-align: center">
<img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image020.jpg" border="0" />
</div>
<div align="center">
<strong><br />
Image-02-06: Cocoa / Coffee Estate at Benji Trace, off Caparo Valley<br />
Brasso Road (south of site) {Photo: Karl Ramjohn, January 2006}</strong>
</div>
<div style="text-align: center">
<img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image021.jpg" border="0" />
</div>
<p class="MsoHeader">
<strong><em><span>RIVER<br />
BANK VEGETATION</span></em></strong>
</p>
<p class="MsoHeader">
<span> As<br />
noted on Table-03, three main classes of vegetation were found growing in the<br />
riparian zone along the <span class="spelle">Caparo</span> and </span><span class="spelle"><span>Mamoral</span></span><span> </span><span>Rivers</span><span> within the study<br />
area:</span>
</p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.75in; text-indent: -0.5in" class="MsoHeader">
<span> (i)</span><span style="font-size: 7pt"><br />
</span><span>Semi-closed<br />
riparian community</span>
</p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.75in; text-indent: -0.5in" class="MsoHeader">
<span>(ii)</span><span style="font-size: 7pt"><br />
</span><span>Semi-open<br />
riparian community</span>
</p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.75in; text-indent: -0.5in" class="MsoHeader">
<span>(iii)</span><span style="font-size: 7pt"><br />
</span><span>Open /<br />
disturbed riparian community </span>
</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span>(<span class="spelle">i</span>)        <u>Semi-closed<br />
riparian community</u></span></strong>
</p>
<p class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span> </span></strong><span>Typical examples of<br />
this class along the river bank are indicated on Image 01-01 and a<br />
representative example of the vegetation was surveyed at Site V-03 and along<br />
the boundary of Site V-02. The classifications as “semi-closed” and “semi-open”<br />
do not represent absolute distinctions (in that no physical measurements of<br />
canopy-closure were done). However, they were based on visual inspection and<br />
other on-site observations of the ecosystem processes/functions such as<br />
micro-climate/micro-habitat conditions, in terms of the degree of ‘shade’<br />
provided to the river channel by the riparian communities, as well as other<br />
ambient indicators of moister conditions, such as communities of mosses on the<br />
riverbanks (above the high-water mark) and on the branches/trunks, the presence<br />
of <span class="spelle">Myceteae</span>, and the degree (and likely dynamics) of<br />
plant-derived organic matter (e.g., leaf litter) on the forest floor.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>In terms of their ecology, these patches<br />
may be seen as representing higher-quality habitats along the river. However,<br />
this represents the habitat conditions in terms of their form and functional<br />
dynamics, as opposed to their botanical <span class="spelle">representativeness</span><br />
(i.e., presence or <span class="spelle">absense</span> of native trees and<br />
related plant assemblages). They persist mainly in areas of the riverbank on<br />
Carr <span class="spelle">Mamoral</span> Trace that are too steep or narrow to be<br />
cultivated and have regenerated to more ‘natural’ conditions. </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>The main trees identified in these areas<br />
included <span class="spelle">Jamoon</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Syzygium</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">cumini</span></em>), Hog Plum (<span class="spelle"><em>Spondias</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">mombin</span></em>), <span class="spelle">Angelin</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Andira</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">inermis</span></em>), <span class="spelle">L’Epinet</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Fagara</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">marticensis</span></em>), Water Immortelle (<span class="spelle"><em>Erythrina</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">fusca</span></em>), <span class="spelle">Conore</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Lonchocarpus</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">domingensis</span></em>),<br />
<span class="spelle">Milkwood</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Sapium</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">glandulosum</span></em>) and <span class="spelle">Manjak</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Cordia</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">collococca</span></em>).<br />
These can generally be regarded as widely distributed native trees often found<br />
in riparian or other water-associated habitats. In these areas, their structural<br />
significance is in the provision of conditions bearing higher <span class="spelle">resemblence</span> to natural canopy. The presence of Roseau (<span class="spelle"><em>Bactris</em></span><em> major</em>), <span class="spelle">Balisier</span><br />
(<span class="spelle"><em>Heliconia</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">bihai</span></em>)<br />
and <span class="spelle">Souhari</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Calathea</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">lutea</span></em>), as well as stands of larger <span class="spelle">graminoid</span>-type vegetation such as Bamboo (<span class="spelle"><em>Bambusa</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">vulgaris</span></em>)<br />
and Wild Cane (<span class="spelle"><em>Gynerium</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">sagittatum</span></em>)<br />
and vines like Dutchman’s Pipe (<span class="spelle"><em>Aristolochia</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">grandiflora</span></em>), would assist in sealing off the<br />
habitat edge (with respect to direct sunlight) thereby enhancing the<br />
micro-climate conditions experienced here. Moisture-holding plants like <span class="spelle">Balisier</span> also provide niche micro-habitat conditions that<br />
support specialized aquatic faunal communities.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>Unlike other areas (such as Carr <span class="spelle">Caparo</span> Trace), the river channel does not appear to have<br />
been dredged at these locations, which is also likely to have a role in the<br />
maintenance of the observed conditions. The river banks are typically steep<br />
with a drop of ~2.5 to 5 m to the river. Within the river channel itself, there<br />
was a high degree of heterogeneity in the substrate (in terms of depth and<br />
topography), with rocky areas and significant amounts of semi-submerged<br />
branches and trunks. Beyond the (average) high-water mark in the channels,<br />
thick communities of encrusting mosses were observed to have colonized the heavy-clay<br />
substrate on the sloping banks. Micro-habitats of mosses and similar<br />
communities were also observed on the trunks and branches of the standing trees<br />
in the more-shaded areas.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>Overall, the vegetation patches with<br />
micro-climate supporting semi-closed riparian communities may be viewed as<br />
minor pockets of higher productivity, biological resource value, and<br />
carbon/energy storage (organic matter pools) in the wider landscape of<br />
agricultural and other disturbed habitat surrounding the <span class="spelle">Caparo/Mamoral</span><br />
River system.      </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span><br />
</span></strong>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span>(ii)<br />
<u>Semi-open riparian community</u></span></strong>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>Typical examples of this class along the<br />
river bank are indicated on Image 01-03 and a representative example of the<br />
vegetation was surveyed at Site V-07. Superficially, the “semi-open” areas appear<br />
to support similar conditions to the “semi-closed” riparian habitat described<br />
above. However, there is considerably less of a canopy development with the<br />
‘shaded’ conditions in the channel mostly resulting from thick stands of Bamboo<br />
(<span class="spelle"><em>Bambusa</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">vulgaris</span></em>)<br />
and occasional (lower density of) trees. As such, the habitat is more open to<br />
direct solar radiation for several hours each day.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>The trees recorded for these areas<br />
included Mountain Immortelle (<span class="spelle"><em>Erythrina</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">poeppigiana</span></em>), Water Immortelle (<span class="spelle"><em>Erythrina</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">fusca</span></em>), <span class="spelle">Angelin</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Andira</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">inermis</span></em>),<br />
Hog Plum (<span class="spelle"><em>Spondias</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">mombin</span></em>),<br />
Black Fiddlewood (<span class="spelle"><em>Vitex</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">divarcata</span></em>),<br />
<span class="spelle">Milkwood</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Sapium</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">glandulosum</span></em>), <span class="spelle">Manjak</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Cordia</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">collococca</span></em>)<br />
and <span class="spelle">Jereton</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Schefflera</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">morotoni</span></em>), together with pioneer species like<br />
Wild Tobacco (<span class="spelle"><em>Acnistus</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">arborescens</span></em>)<br />
and Bois <span class="spelle">Canot</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Cecropia</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">peltata</span></em>). The moister conditions have led to the<br />
riverbanks being widely colonized by Wild Dasheen (<span class="spelle"><em>Colocosia</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">esculenta</span></em>); however, there was little evidence of<br />
<span class="spelle">Balisier</span> or other <span class="spelle"><em>Heliconia</em></span><br />
species.</span>
</p>
<p><span> <strong><br />
(iii)     <u>Open<br />
/ disturbed riparian community</u></strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>The riparian vegetation in these areas<br />
is represented by plant communities (mainly grasses and cultivated species<br />
other than tree crops) indicative of disturbance. This class is very common in </span><span>Trinidad</span><span> in areas<br />
traditionally associated with agriculture. Typical examples of this class are<br />
indicated on Image-01-02 &#038; Image-02-01, and a representative example of the<br />
vegetation was surveyed at Site V-11, in addition to which basic observations<br />
on vegetation were made at aquatic survey Site MD-3 (which was associated with<br />
an open/disturbed habitat of this nature). In these areas, the river banks have<br />
been entirely cleared of trees and other native riparian vegetation, usually to<br />
facilitate agriculture. In some parts of the study area, the open/disturbed<br />
river banks were not cultivated at the time of the survey; however, in others<br />
there were crops on the banks (or in the immediate vicinity) especially by the<br />
bridges on Carr <span class="spelle">Caparo</span> Trace (Site V-11) and </span><span class="spelle"><span>Mamoral</span></span><span> Road</span><span> (Site MD-3). </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>The healthier riparian ecosystems<br />
described (i.e., semi-closed riparian class) were characterized by<br />
sparsely-vegetated channel slopes (primarily mosses), as a result of the moist<br />
conditions with limited sunlight penetration on the ground-level. In contrast,<br />
the banks of the open/disturbed areas were bounded by thicker vegetation such<br />
as grasses and vines, with the immediate area of the banks dominated by Wild<br />
Dasheen (<span class="spelle"><em>Colocosia</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">esculenta</span></em>),<br />
and Water Grass (<span class="spelle"><em>Commelina</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">erecta</span></em> and <span class="spelle"><em>Commelina</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">diffusia</span></em>). These are supported by the perpetually<br />
moist organic soils with unimpeded exposure to sunlight; Dasheen in particular<br />
thrive in high-nutrient, water-saturated soils (<span class="spelle">Gouveia</span><br />
<em>et al</em>. 1994).<br />
</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>Some of the river banks with<br />
open/disturbed vegetation were associated with Sugar Cane production. However,<br />
in some areas small plots of vegetable cultivation were also seen in the<br />
riparian zone. These were mainly herbaceous crops like Cucumber (<span class="spelle"><em>Cucumis</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">sativus</span></em>),<br />
Pak <span class="spelle">Choi</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Brassica</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">chinensis</span></em>) and Lettuce (<span class="spelle"><em>Lactuca</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">sativa</span></em>), as well as <span class="spelle">Ochro</span><br />
(<span class="spelle"><em>Abelmoschus</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">esculentus</span></em>)<br />
and Pigeon Peas (<span class="spelle"><em>Cajanus</em></span><em> <span class="grame">cajan</span></em>).</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>The trees present in the areas<br />
classifiable as open/disturbed habitat had a greater tendency to be isolated<br />
and thus not associated with the development of a canopy. These were mainly<br />
trees commonly recorded for the study area, such as <span class="spelle">Jamoon</span><br />
(<span class="spelle"><em>Syzygium</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">cumini</span></em>),<br />
Water Immortelle (<span class="spelle"><em>Erythrina</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">fusca</span></em>), <span class="spelle">Milkwood</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Sapium</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">glandulosum</span></em>),<br />
and Pink <span class="spelle">Poui</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Tabebuia</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">rosea</span></em>). Close to Site V-11 a few Teak (<span class="spelle"><em>Tectona</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">grandis</span></em>)<br />
and Caribbean Pine (<span class="spelle"><em>Pinus</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">Caribea</span></em>) trees were observed in close association with<br />
a small cluster of Roseau Palms (<span class="spelle"><em>Bactris</em></span><em><br />
major</em>). Teak and Pine are two of the major (introduced) species planted by<br />
the Forestry Division for the commercial timber industry. However, at this<br />
site, they were not part of a forest plantation and had probably been planted<br />
by an individual smallholder (incidental to the cropping<br />
system).    </span>
</p>
<p class="MsoHeader">
<strong><em><span><br />
</span></em></strong>
</p>
<p class="MsoHeader">
<strong><em><span>RIVER<br />
VALLEY VEGETATION</span></em></strong>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>As noted on Table-03, three main classes<br />
of vegetation were found growing in the alluvial flat land in the low-lying<br />
valley areas along the <span class="spelle">Caparo</span> and </span><span class="spelle"><span>Mamoral</span></span><span> </span><span>Rivers</span><span> within the study<br />
area:</span>
</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; text-indent: -0.5in" class="MsoHeader">
<span>(i)</span><span style="font-size: 7pt"><br />
</span><span>Active<br />
agricultural land (occupied by crops)</span>
</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; text-indent: -0.5in" class="MsoHeader">
<span>(ii)</span><span style="font-size: 7pt"><br />
</span><span>Inactive<br />
agricultural land (grassland / scattered trees)</span>
</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; text-indent: -0.5in" class="MsoHeader">
<span>(iii)</span><span style="font-size: 7pt"><br />
</span><span>Village /<br />
residential (fruit trees, ornamentals, etc.)</span>
</p>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span>(<span class="spelle">i</span>)<br />
<u>Active agricultural land</u></span></strong>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>While almost all of the flat land in the<br />
area surrounding the <span class="spelle">Caparo/Mamoral</span> River system may<br />
be classified as agricultural, not all such areas were under active cultivation<br />
at the time of the vegetation surveys. Typical examples of land classifiable as<br />
being under “active” agriculture are indicated on Image-02-02 &#038;<br />
Image-02-03, and representative examples of this vegetation would have been<br />
surveyed in most of the areas within Sites V-02 to V-05 (along Carr <span class="spelle">Mamoral</span> Trace).</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>The health and ecosystem function of<br />
agricultural areas (both within and between sites) will depend on all<br />
components of its ecological character: physical (climate/soils), biological –<br />
vegetation (crops, weeds, other plants) and fauna (pests, beneficial insects,<br />
livestock, and wildlife species associated with semi-open areas), human inputs<br />
(labour, energy, water, chemicals) and overall interactions. In a spatial,<br />
ecological (and commercial) sense, the most significant cultivated crops within<br />
the project site (<span class="spelle">Caparo/Mamoral</span> confluence) are<br />
Cassava </span><span style="font-size: 11pt"></span><span class="spelle"><em><span>(Manihot</span></em></span><em><span> <span class="spelle">esculenta)</span></span></em><span style="font-size: 11pt"> </span><span>and Sugar Cane (</span><span class="spelle"><em><span>Saccharum</span></em></span><em><span> <span class="spelle">officinarum</span></span></em><span>). These two crops<br />
cover most of the larger agricultural plots under active cultivation. Smaller<br />
amounts of other short-term food crops are planted commercially in this area,<br />
such as Pigeon Peas (</span><span class="spelle"><em><span>Cajanus</span></em></span><em><span> <span class="spelle">cajan</span></span></em><span>), <span class="spelle">Ochro</span><br />
(<span class="spelle"><em>Abelmoschus</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">esculentus</span></em>),<br />
Sorrel (<em>Hibiscus <span class="spelle">sabdariffa</span></em>), Pawpaw (<span class="spelle"><em>Carica</em></span><em> papaya</em>) and Banana (<span class="spelle"><em>Musa</em></span><em> sp</em>.), as well as an area on Carr <span class="spelle">Mamoral</span> Trace in which “Portugal” Oranges (<em>Citrus sp</em>.)<br />
are cultivated. The wider area does not have a pipe-borne water supply (relying<br />
on water-trucks) and thus it is likely that the river is used both as a source<br />
and a sink for agricultural water.      </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span> </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoNormal">
<span>In the<br />
immediate project area, Sugar Cane cultivation is focussed mainly between the </span><span>Carr <span class="spelle">Mamoral</span><br />
Road</span><span> and the river bank (Sites V-02 to V-05); however, unlike larger<br />
estates, it is not continuous within this area and is interspersed with<br />
Cassava, grassland and other vegetation. Sugar Cane is <span class="grame">a very</span><br />
large <span class="spelle">graminoid</span> (grass-type) vegetation (growing up<br />
to 3 m tall) and on flat land areas they are typically planted on banks to<br />
prevent inundation during the wet season. Harvesting of the crop is generally<br />
preceded by the systematic burning of the fields. At times of harvesting the<br />
soil in these areas is left relatively exposed, which would have ecological<br />
implications associated with increased erosion potential and run-off into the<br />
river; however, the crop season is generally within the first few months of the<br />
dry season. The larger <span class="spelle">monocultural</span> areas of Sugar<br />
Cane in </span><span>Central<br />
Trinidad</span><span><br />
have been described as representing effective “deserts” for many species of<br />
wildlife (<em>personal comments</em> Graham White). However, based on observations<br />
for the present survey, this effect may be less drastic at the project site, as<br />
a result of the relatively small areas under Sugar Cane cultivation (and the<br />
lack of spatial continuity between such areas).  </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span> </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>As a result of favourable soil<br />
characteristics and other factors, Cassava is the most commonly cultivated root<br />
crop in the </span><span class="spelle"><span>Caparo</span></span><span> </span><span>Basin</span><span> (Grant <em>et al</em>.<br />
1996). This is a broadleaf shrub that grows to heights of 2 m; however, the<br />
targeted component is the root tubers (i.e., its below-ground biomass). Cassava<br />
cropping requires considerable soil disturbance and modification to organic<br />
matter and nutrient regimes (<span class="spelle">Kellman</span> &#038; <span class="spelle">Tackaberry</span> 1997). It is usually planted on banks (which are<br />
kept clear of weeds), generally at the start of the annual wet season and harvested<br />
about 8-9 months later (<span class="spelle">Seesahai</span> 1996); however, the<br />
varying size of the plants seen in the study area during January 2006 indicates<br />
that there is not strict adherence to this technique. A study by Grant <em>et al</em>.<br />
(1996) on small Cassava farms at <span class="spelle">Longdenville</span> (lower<br />
down in the </span><span class="spelle"><span>Caparo</span></span><span> </span><span>Basin</span><span>) described the<br />
production system as “chemically-intensive” (fertilizers, pesticides, <em>etc</em>.).<br />
Relatively large monocultures of Cassava were observed along the Carr <span class="spelle">Mamoral</span> Trace, especially in the areas surrounding sites<br />
V-02 and V-03 (closer to the river, on the edge of the larger Sugar Cane<br />
field). </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span> </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span>(ii)<br />
<u>Inactive agricultural land </u></span></strong>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span> </span></strong>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>Typical examples of land classifiable as<br />
being “inactive agricultural” are indicated on Image-01-04, and representative<br />
examples of this vegetation would be found throughout Sites V-02 to V-05,<br />
especially in the area surrounding Site V-04. While inactive agricultural areas<br />
dominated by grassland are often described as ‘abandoned’ or ‘<span class="spelle">lastro</span>’, in this area it is considered likely that the land<br />
is used for agriculture at other times (and left in its current grassland state<br />
as part of a fallow system). </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span> </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>Overall, grasslands at inactive<br />
agricultural areas are often regarded as “fire-climax” ecosystems (especially<br />
where they bound Sugar Cane cultivation), and tend to exhibit landscape<br />
similarity to savannas, as they are characterized by a few dominant grass<br />
types, with scattered individual (or occasional clumps of) trees. However, they<br />
are structurally and functionally simpler and considerably less diverse or<br />
unique than the natural <span class="spelle">savanna</span> ecosystems that have<br />
developed in other parts of </span><span>Trinidad</span><span> (Armstrong <em>et al</em>.<br />
2004, <span class="spelle">Comeau</span> &#038; <span class="spelle">Clubbe</span><br />
1998). The <span class="spelle">graminoid</span>-dominated inactive agricultural<br />
lands in </span><span>Trinidad</span><span> may also be regarded as representing<br />
areas of “arrested succession” in the natural environment (<em>personal comments</em><br />
Stanley A. Temple), since the exotic (non-native) grass species typically<br />
colonizing these ecosystems tend to inhibit the rate at which natural forest <span class="spelle">regeration</span> takes place.   </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span> </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>Inactive agriculture land along Carr <span class="spelle">Mamoral</span> Trace is dominated by coarse perennial grasses,<br />
mainly Bull Grass (<span class="spelle"><em>Paspalum</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">fasciculatum</span></em>) with some Elephant Grass (<span class="spelle"><em>Pennisetum</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">purpureum</span></em>)<br />
in wetter areas. The grasses are interspersed with vines such as Kudzu (<span class="spelle"><em>Pueraria</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">phaseoloides</span></em>)<br />
and other small herbaceous flowering plants on the roadside, such as Railway <span class="spelle">Daisey</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Bidens</em></span><em> <span class="grame">alba</span></em>). Several variably-sized patches of Bamboo (<span class="spelle"><em>Bambusa</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">vulgaris</span></em>)<br />
were also observed in the grassland areas on inactive agricultural land along<br />
Carr <span class="spelle">Mamoral</span> Trace. While this is a non-native<br />
species in Trinidad (originating in the Asian tropics), Bamboo has become<br />
widespread throughout the island, especially as an early-stage <span class="spelle">sucession</span> component of the vegetation in agricultural or<br />
other frequently disturbed areas (<span class="spelle">Teixeira</span> &#038; <span class="spelle">Oatham</span> 2001), often with dispersal and colonization by<br />
‘natural’ means.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span> </span>
</p>
<p class="MsoBodyText">
<span>At<br />
the inactive agricultural site surveyed along Carr <span class="spelle">Mamoral</span><br />
Trace, one species of significance among the scattered trees was the Royal Palm<br />
(<span class="spelle"><em>Roystonea</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">oleracea</span></em>).<br />
This very tall straight-growing palm that attains a height of 30 – 50 <span class="grame">m,</span> is tolerant of a wide range of environmental conditions<br />
and is thus fairly widely distributed. Black Fiddlewood (<span class="spelle"><em>Vitex</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">divaricata</span></em>) is another fairly large native tree<br />
observed in this area.</span>
</p>
<p style="margin-top: 12pt" class="MsoBodyText">
<strong><span>(iii)      <u>Village<br />
/ residential</u></span></strong>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span> </span></strong>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>This class is used to describe the<br />
vegetation typically found in the village areas adjacent to the project site<br />
the along the <span class="spelle">Caparo</span> Valley <span class="spelle">Brasso</span><br />
Valley Road (e.g., Site V-10); it is also used to account for the differences<br />
in vegetation found at the small clusters of houses and isolated residences in<br />
the agricultural land along Carr <span class="spelle">Caparo</span> Trace and<br />
Carr <span class="spelle">Mamoral</span> Trace (e.g., Sites V-02, V-03, V-04 and<br />
V-11).</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span> </span></strong>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>The gardens of the houses usually have<br />
ornamental plants such as small palms, flowering shrubs and shade trees, many<br />
of which are non-native species. Also, some small-scale food cropping usually<br />
takes place in the immediate vicinity the houses, primarily for household<br />
consumption (as opposed to the larger commercial production of Cassava and<br />
Sugar Cane in this area). However, the main difference observed around houses<br />
is the greater presence of trees. The trees surrounding the housing areas at<br />
the project site are predominantly fruit trees– Coconut (<span class="spelle"><em>Cocos</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">nucifera</span></em>), Mango (<span class="spelle"><em>Mangifera</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">indica</span></em>), and Breadfruit (<span class="spelle"><em>Artocarpus</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">communis</span></em>) with lesser amounts of <span class="spelle">Pommerac</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Syzygium</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">malaccense</span></em>), <span class="spelle">Pewa</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Bactris</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">gasipaes</span></em>)<br />
and Plum (<span class="spelle"><em>Spondias</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">purpurea</span></em>)<br />
trees, as well as occasional Cashew (<span class="spelle"><em>Anacardium</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">occidentale</span></em>) and Betel Nut (<em>Areca catechu</em>).<br />
</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span> </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>Roadside vegetation in these areas<br />
typically consists of widely dispersed grasses, other herbaceous plants and<br />
shrubs such as Fowl-foot Grass (<span class="spelle"><em>Eleusine</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">indica</span></em>), <span class="spelle">Savanna</span> Grass (<span class="spelle"><em>Axonopus</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">compressus</span></em>),<br />
Railway Daisy (<span class="spelle"><em>Bidens</em></span><em> <span class="grame">alba</span></em>),<br />
Sensitive Plant (<em>Mimosa <span class="spelle">pudica</span></em>), Broom Weed (<span class="spelle"><em>Sida</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">acuta</span></em>),<br />
Stinging Nettle (<span class="spelle"><em>Laportia</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">aestuans</span></em>), Wild Hops (<span class="spelle"><em>Flemingia</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">strobilifera</span></em>), </span><span>St. John’s</span><span> Bush (<span class="spelle"><em>Justicia</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">secunda</span></em>)<br />
and Candle Bush (<em>Piper <span class="spelle">tuberculatum</span></em>).</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span> </span>
</p>
<p style="text-indent: 0.5in" class="MsoHeader">
<em><span>2.3.3.3<br />
Intermediate </span></em><em><span>Upland</span></em><em><span> Vegetation</span></em>
</p>
<p class="MsoHeader">
<span> </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>The immediate north of the study site is<br />
characterized by a comparatively steeply-sloping ridge, which rises to an<br />
elevation of ~100 m. As noted on Table 2-10, three main classes of vegetation<br />
were observed in this area:</span>
</p>
<p class="MsoHeader">
<span> </span>
</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; text-indent: -0.5in" class="MsoHeader">
<span>(i)</span><span style="font-size: 7pt"><br />
</span><span>Forest</span><span> patches in higher<br />
elevations (remnant indigenous, secondary)</span>
</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; text-indent: -0.5in" class="MsoHeader">
<span>(ii)</span><span style="font-size: 7pt"><br />
</span><span>Hillside</span><span> / valley cropping<br />
systems</span>
</p>
<p style="margin-left: 1in; text-indent: -0.5in" class="MsoHeader">
<span>(iii)</span><span style="font-size: 7pt"><br />
</span><span>Village /<br />
residential (fruit trees, ornamentals, etc.)</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span> </span></strong>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span>(<span class="spelle">i</span>)<br />
</span></strong><u><strong><span>Forest</span></strong></u>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span> </span></strong>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>On higher ridges of hill to immediate<br />
north of site (not directly accessed for the current survey) the vegetation is<br />
dominated by tree species typical of seasonal evergreen tropical forest. The<br />
composition of the plant community will be a combination of the species<br />
recorded in the lowlands (which tend to be forest species that are easily<br />
dispersed) and other tree species more indicative of the natural plant<br />
community. </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span> </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span class="spelle"><span>Angelin</span></span><span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Andira</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">inermis</span></em>), Hog Plum (<span class="spelle"><em>Spondias</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">mombin</span></em>), Black Fiddlewood (<span class="spelle"><em>Vitex</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">divarcata</span></em>), <span class="spelle">Milkwood</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Sapium</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">glandulosum</span></em>),<br />
<span class="spelle">Manjak</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Cordia</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">collococca</span></em>), Olivier (<span class="spelle"><em>Terminalia</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">amazonia</span></em>) and <span class="spelle">Jereton</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Schefflera</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">morotoni</span></em>)<br />
are some of the main species likely to be encountered in these areas, based on<br />
their occurrence in survey points on the edges of the forested ridge (e.g.,<br />
Sites V-12 and V-13). The main difference is that on the higher slopes, a<br />
higher-quality canopy structure (and therefore ecological <span class="spelle">integity</span>)<br />
is to be expected. Species such as <span class="spelle">Acurel</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Trichilia</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">oblanceolata</span></em>)<br />
and Wild <span class="spelle">Chataigne</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Pachira</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">insignis</span></em>), though not encountered in the survey,<br />
may be found on steeper (less accessible) slopes. Notwithstanding this, it is<br />
less likely that the dominants of the seasonal evergreen formation (<span class="spelle">Crappo-Guatecare</span> association) as described by Beard (1946)<br />
will remain on these slopes, particularly <span class="spelle">Crappo</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Carapa</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">guianensis</span></em>)<br />
and <span class="spelle">Guatecare</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Eschweilera</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">subglandulosa</span></em>) as they are much sought after and<br />
extracted for their timber.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span> </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span>(ii)<br />
</span></strong><u><strong><span>Hillside</span></strong></u><strong><u><span> / valley cropping<br />
systems</span></u></strong>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span> </span></strong>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>Typical examples of higher land under<br />
agricultural use (hillside / valley cropping) are indicated on Image-02-04, and<br />
representative examples of this vegetation were surveyed at Sites V-06 and<br />
V-12. While the higher land and ridges of the hill formation to the north of the<br />
project site remains primarily under forest or forest-derived vegetation cover,<br />
some agriculture was observed to be taking place. For example, while most<br />
cultivation along Carr <span class="spelle">Mamoral</span> Trace was within the<br />
flat alluvial valley (already described), some cultivation was observed on the<br />
lower slopes of the ridge to the extreme north of this area. Such activity<br />
focussed on Cassava (</span><span class="spelle"><em><span>Manihot</span></em></span><em><span> <span class="spelle">esculenta</span></span></em><span>) cultivation and<br />
appeared to be having only a minor ‘footprint’ impact, in relation to<br />
encroachment on the bulk of the surrounding upland forest vegetation and<br />
structure.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span> </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>In relation to this higher elevation<br />
feature, the main area of hillside/valley cropping was on a lower part of the<br />
ridge (~30 m), in the eastern part of the project site. In that area, the<br />
south-facing slope is bounded by Carr <span class="spelle">Mamoral</span> Trace<br />
and was not under active cultivation at the time of the survey, dominated by<br />
grassland with tall isolated trees (mainly on the top of the ridge). The<br />
north-facing slope is bounded by Lynch Trace (Site V-06 just north of </span><span class="spelle"><span>Mamoral</span></span><span> </span><span>Cemetery</span><span>) and this slope was<br />
extensively cultivated by a monoculture of Pigeon Peas (</span><span class="spelle"><em><span>Cajanus</span></em></span><em><span> <span class="grame">cajan</span></span></em><span>). Lynch Trace also<br />
accesses the forest on the adjacent higher parts of the hill, and in the<br />
valleys of this area cultivation of almost exclusively Pigeon Peas with lesser<br />
amounts of <span class="spelle">Ochro</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Abelmoschus</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">esculentus</span></em>) was observed. However, this area can<br />
be distinguished from the flatland agriculture surrounding the <span class="spelle">Caparo/Mamoral</span> confluence by the higher degree of<br />
forest-derived vegetation surrounding the plots.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span> </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>Generally, the entire hillsides are not<br />
under crops, the cultivated areas are patches of plots, which exist in close<br />
association with the upland forest and forest-derived ecosystems. The roadside<br />
along Lynch Trace was dominated by forest-edge vegetation such as Bois <span class="spelle">Canot</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Cecropia</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">peltata</span></em>), Bois <span class="spelle">Flot</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Ochroma</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">pyramidale</span></em>),<br />
Wild Tobacco (<span class="spelle"><em>Acnistus</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">arborescens</span></em>),<br />
Black Sage (<span class="spelle"><em>Cordia</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">cussaravica</span></em>)<br />
and extensive stands of Bamboo (<span class="spelle"><em>Bambusa</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">vulgaris</span></em>). However, larger trees were observed in the<br />
surroundings including Mountain Immortelle (<span class="spelle"><em>Erythrina</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">poeppigiana</span></em>), Water Immortelle (<span class="spelle"><em>Erythrina</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">fusca</span></em>), <span class="spelle">Roble</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Platymiscium</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">trinitatis</span></em>), and Hog Plum (<span class="spelle"><em>Spondias</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">mombin</span></em>) as well as palms such as Carat (<span class="spelle"><em>Sabal</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">mauritiiformis</span></em>)<br />
and Royal Palm (<span class="spelle"><em>Roystonea</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">oleracea</span></em>). </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span> </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>Other areas with hillside/valley<br />
cropping were surveyed on the northern side of the ridge (Site V-13), accessed<br />
via Carr <span class="spelle">Caparo</span> Trace. The main crops observed were<br />
Cassava and Sugar Cane. However, an even higher diversity of native trees was<br />
observed in this area (several of which were not recorded for the lowland parts<br />
of the study area) including <span class="spelle">Cuchape</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Coccoloba</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">latifolia</span></em>),<br />
Olivier (<span class="spelle"><em>Terminalia</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">amazonia</span></em>),<br />
<span class="spelle">Cocorite</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Attalea</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">maripa</span></em>), <span class="spelle">Kiskidee</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Vismia</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">cayennensis</span></em>),<br />
Bois <span class="spelle">d’Orme</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Guazuma</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">ulmifolia</span></em>), <span class="spelle">L’Epinet</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Fagara</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">marticensis</span></em>)<br />
and Juniper (<span class="spelle"><em>Genipa</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">americana</span></em>),<br />
as well as Teak (<span class="spelle"><em>Tectona</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">grandis</span></em>) and Mahogany (<span class="spelle"><em>Swietenia</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">macrophylla</span></em>).    </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span> </span></strong>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span>(iii)      <u>Village<br />
/ residential</u></span></strong>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<strong><span> </span></strong>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>This area is an effectively<br />
linear/clustered settlement along parts of the ridge road (accessed from Carr <span class="spelle">Caparo</span> Trace), with the houses surrounded by (and<br />
interspersed with) secondary forest and agriculture. Representative examples of<br />
this vegetation were surveyed at Site V-12. In addition to the typical<br />
ornamental plants, fruit trees and small-scale cropping at the houses (as<br />
described for the flat land areas on Carr <span class="spelle">Mamoral</span><br />
Trace), the plant community in this area contains tree species that are<br />
remnants of the wider forest areas, such as on the higher elevations on the<br />
adjacent ridge (immediately south of the houses). </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span> </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoHeader">
<span>Species such as Hog Plum (<span class="spelle"><em>Spondias</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">mombin</span></em>), <span class="spelle">Manjak</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Cordia</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">collococca</span></em>), Bois <span class="spelle">d’Orme</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Guazuma</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">ulmifolia</span></em>),<br />
<span class="spelle">Jereton</span> (<span class="spelle"><em>Schefflera</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">morototoni</span></em>) and Black <span class="spelle">Poui</span><br />
(<span class="spelle"><em>Tabebuia</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">chrysantha</span></em>)<br />
were recorded on the southern side of the road. On the opposite side of the<br />
road there were a few Teak (<span class="spelle"><em>Tectona</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">grandis</span></em>), <span class="spelle">Castilloa</span> Rubber (<span class="spelle"><em>Castilla</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">elastica</span></em>),<br />
Mahogany (<span class="spelle"><em>Swietenia</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">macrophylla</span></em>)<br />
and Mango (<span class="spelle"><em>Mangifera</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">indica</span></em>)<br />
which are all introduced species and most likely planted in the area in the<br />
past. Roadside vegetation consisted of Bull Grass (<span class="spelle"><em>Paspalum</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">fasciculatum</span></em>), Wild Hops (<span class="spelle"><em>Flemingia</em></span><em><br />
<span class="spelle">strobilifera</span></em>) and the vine Kudzu (<span class="spelle"><em>Pueraria</em></span><em> <span class="spelle">phaseoloides</span></em>).</span>
</p>
</p>
<p class="MsoBodyText">
<strong><span>SPATIAL<br />
– ECOLOGICAL DATA REPRESENTATION</span></strong>
</p>
<div style="text-align: center">
<img src="http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/12/65/29/09/image022.jpg" border="0" />
</div>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoNormal">
<span>References:</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoNormal">
<span>Armstrong, R.,<br />
Oatham, M. &#038; Ramlal, B. 2004. “Plant Community Changes on the Erin<br />
Savannah”. <em>In</em> Ramjohn, C.L. (ed). <u>Proceedings of “The Nature of the </u></span><u><span>Islands</span></u><u><span>”: A Conference<br />
on </span></u><u><span>Caribbean</span></u><u><span> </span></u><u><span>Island</span></u><u><span> Natural History in Memory of Peter R. Bacon</span></u><span>. <em>Living World 2004 (Supplement) – Journal of the Trinidad &#038;<br />
Tobago Field Naturalists’ Club</em>; 52 pp.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoNormal">
<span>Beard, J.S.<br />
1946. <u>The Natural Vegetation of </u></span><u><span>Trinidad</span></u><span>. Clarendon Press, </span><span>Oxford</span><span>; 146 pp.</span>
</p>
<p class="MsoBodyText">
<span>Comeau, P. &#038; Clubbe, C.C.<br />
1998. <u>Savanna Expansion in </u></span><u><span>Trinidad</span></u><u><span> </span></u><u><span>West Indies</span></u><span>. <em>Living World 1997-98 – Journal of the Trinidad and<br />
Tobago Field Naturalists’ Club</em>; pp. 23-27</span>
</p>
<p class="MsoBodyText">
<span>Gouveia, G., Ahmad, N. &#038;<br />
Griffith, S. 1994. <u>The Effects of Urea-N on Yield, Productivity, and<br />
N-Uptake in a Dasheen–Pigeon Pea Intercropping System</u>. <em>Advances in<br />
Tropical Agriculture in the 20<sup>th</sup> Century and Prospects for the 21<sup>st</sup></em>.<br />
Faculty of Agriculture, University of the </span><span>West Indies</span><span>; pp.<br />
62-67</span>
</p>
<p class="MsoBodyText">
<span>Grant, L., Mainville, D., St.<br />
Rose, R. &#038; Ram, R.D. 1996. <u>Sustainability Issues of Food Crop Production<br />
in </u></span><u><span>Trinidad</span></u><span>. <em>Sixth International Extension Field Workshop</em>.<br />
Department of Agricultural Extension, University of the </span><span>West Indies</span><span>, </span><span>St. Augustine</span><span>. January 1996; pp. 115-127.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoNormal">
<span>Joseph, </span><span>I.</span><span> 1999. <u>Biodiversity<br />
Information: Report on Terrestrial Flora</u>. <em>National Biodiversity Strategy<br />
and Action Plan Project</em>. Environmental Management Authority, </span><span>Republic</span><span> of </span><span>Trinidad</span><span> &#038;<br />
</span><span>Tobago</span><span>;<br />
46 pp.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoNormal">
<span>Kellman, M.<br />
&#038; Tackaberry, R. 1997. <u>Tropical Environments: The Functioning and<br />
Management of Tropical Ecosystems</u>. Routledge Physical Environment Series;<br />
380 pp.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoNormal">
<span>Floyd B. Lucas, Carol L. Ramjohn, Karl Ramjohn, Wayne Rostant, Ryan S. Mohammed, Winston Johnson &#038; Pooran Badal 2006. <u>Surveys and Assessment of Biological Environment: Proposed<br />
Mamoral Dam and Related Infrastructure, Carr Mamoral Trace, Caparo</u>.<br />
Prepared for Haskoning Caribbean Ltd on behalf of National Infrastructure Development Company of Trinidad &#038;<br />
Tobago Ltd. January 2006; 72 pp.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoNormal">
<span>Howard P. Nelson 1999. <u>Biodiversity Information: Terrestrial Fauna Sector Report</u>. <em>National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan</em>. Environmental Management Authority, Republic of Trinidad & Tobago; 36 pp.<br />
</span>
</p>
<p class="MsoBodyText">
<span>Howard P. Nelson 2004. Ph.D. Thesis: Tropical Forest Ecosystems of Trinidad: Ecological Patterns and Public Perceptions. Department of Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison. </span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoNormal">
<span>Karl Ramjohn, Floyd B. Lucas, Carol L. Ramjohn. 2001. <u>Environmental Impact Assessment for<br />
Operations and Maintenance of a Bioremediation Facility: Block PS-1, Palo Seco</u>.<br />
Lease Operators Ltd. May 2001.</span>
</p>
<p class="MsoBodyText">
<span>Seesahai, A.E. 1996. <u>Government<br />
and Community Support for the Sustainable Development of Root Crops and<br />
Associated Problems of Environmental Management in the </u></span><u><span>Caribbean</span></u><span>. <em>Sixth<br />
International Extension Field Workshop</em>. Department of Agricultural<br />
Extension, University of the </span><span>West<br />
Indies</span><span>, </span><span>St. Augustine</span><span>. January 1996; pp. 19-23.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoNormal">
<span>Teixeira, J.S.<br />
&#038; Oatham, M.P. 2001. <u>An Investigation into the Effect of Bamboo on the<br />
Surrounding Vegetation in the </u></span><u><span>Arena</span></u><u><span> </span></u><u><span>Forest</span></u><u><span><br />
Reserve</span></u><span>. <em>Living World 2001 – Journal of the<br />
Trinidad &#038; Tobago Field Naturalists’ Club</em>; pp. 13-20.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoNormal">
<span>Stanley A. Temple</span><span></span><span>: Department of Wildlife Ecology, </span><span>University of Wisconsin–Madison</span><span>, </span><span>USA</span><span>. Personal comments, </span><span>February<br />
18, 1999</span><span>.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify" class="MsoNormal">
<span>Graham White: </span><span>Caroni</span><span> (1975) Ltd Research Station, </span><span>Waterloo Road</span><span>, Carapichaima, Trinidad &#038; Tobago. Personal<br />
comments, </span><span>November 04, 1998</span><span>.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ecospatial.informe.com/blog/2008/11/01/spatial-ecological-assessment-of-land-use-land-cover-caparo-river-valley-republic-of-trinidad-tobago/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
